丁家荣, 张欢, 谌卫, 赵君花, 梁新蕊, 郭志勇. 甲磺酸萘莫司他在高危出血风险连续肾脏替代治疗患者的抗凝应用[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2024, 24(2): 96-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2024.02.002
    引用本文: 丁家荣, 张欢, 谌卫, 赵君花, 梁新蕊, 郭志勇. 甲磺酸萘莫司他在高危出血风险连续肾脏替代治疗患者的抗凝应用[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2024, 24(2): 96-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2024.02.002
    Ding Jia-rong, Zhang Huan, Chen Wei, Zhao Jun-hua, Liang Xin-rui, Guo Zhi-yong. Anticoagulation application of nafamostat mesylate in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy at a high risk of hemorrhage[J]. Journal of Clinical Nephrology, 2024, 24(2): 96-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2024.02.002
    Citation: Ding Jia-rong, Zhang Huan, Chen Wei, Zhao Jun-hua, Liang Xin-rui, Guo Zhi-yong. Anticoagulation application of nafamostat mesylate in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy at a high risk of hemorrhage[J]. Journal of Clinical Nephrology, 2024, 24(2): 96-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2024.02.002

    甲磺酸萘莫司他在高危出血风险连续肾脏替代治疗患者的抗凝应用

    Anticoagulation application of nafamostat mesylate in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy at a high risk of hemorrhage

    • 摘要:
      目的  观察甲磺酸萘莫司他在高危出血倾向连续肾脏替代治疗(continuous renal replacement therapy, CRRT)患者中抗凝有效性及安全性。
      方法  回顾性分析了 2021年3月至2022年2月在上海长海医院重症监护病房中,具有高危出血倾向,需行CRRT治疗的成年患者,共计61例。根据是否使用抗凝剂及抗凝剂种类分为甲磺酸萘莫司他组和无抗凝组。观察抗凝有效性、安全性及经济性。
      结果  甲磺酸萘莫司他抗凝组患者33例、无抗凝组患者28例,所有患者治疗过程中均未见明显不良反应发生。将滤器和静脉壶中度以下凝血视为抗凝有效,其中甲磺酸萘莫司他组抗凝有效率明显高于无抗凝组(93.9% 比28.6%,P<0.001),治疗过程中静脉壶活化部分凝血活酶时间(activated partial thromboplastin time, APTT)明显高于治疗前外周血APTT(72.9 ± 8.9)s 比(42.3 ± 6.6)s, P<0.001,同时也高于治疗过程中外周血APTT(72.9 ± 8.9)s比(43.0 ± 5.5)s, P<0.001,而治疗前、治疗中及治疗后外周血APTT均差异无统计学意义(42.3 ± 6.6)s、(43.0 ± 5.5)s、(42.3 ± 5.6)s,P>0.05。无肝素抗凝组患者治疗过程中静脉压升高值明显高于甲磺酸萘莫司他组(P = 0.001),同时结束时跨膜压水平也高于甲磺酸萘莫司他组(P = 0.003)。在甲磺酸萘莫司他组中,治疗前后血红蛋白水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
      结论  甲磺酸萘莫司他可用作高危出血倾向患者CRRT治疗安全且有效的抗凝剂,不会增加高危出血倾向患者发生出血的风险,达到良好的抗凝效果。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate (NM) in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) at a high risk of hemorrhage.
      Methods From March 2021 to February 2022, a retrospective study was conducted for 61 CRRT patients at a high risk of hemorrhage in intensive care unit of Shanghai Changhai Hospital. They were assigned into two groups of NM anticoagulation (n=33) and no anticoagulation (n=28). The effectiveness, safety and economy of anticoagulation were assessed.
      Results Baseline profiles differed insignificantly between two groups. No obvious adverse reactions occurred during treatment. The anticoagulant effective rate of NM anticoagulation group was significantly higher than that of no anticoagulant group (93.9% vs 28.6%, P<0.001). Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of venous jug during treatment was significantly higher than pre-treatment (72.9±8.9) vs (42.3±6.6) s, P<0.001 and also higher than that of contralateral peripheral blood during CRRT (72.9±8.9) vs (43.0±5.5) s, P<0.001. No significant change of APTT occurred before and after CRRT (42.3±6.6), (43.0±5.5), (42.3±5.6) s, P>0.05. The elevation of venous pressure was significantly higher in heparin free anticoagulant group than that in NM group (P=0.001) and the level of transmembrane pressure was also higher than that in NM group at the end of treatment (P=0.003). No significant change occurred in hemoglobin level before versus after CRRT in NM group (P>0.05).
      Conclusion NM is a safe and effective anticoagulant for CRRT patients at a high risk of hemorrhage and allows sufficient filter survival without a higher risk of hemorrhage.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回