血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂对不同类型左心室射血分数心力衰竭的维持性血液透析患者疗效评估

    Efficacy of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for maintenance hemodialysis patients with different types of left ventricular ejection fraction heart failure

    • 摘要:
      目的  探讨血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors,ARNI)代表药物沙库巴曲缬沙坦(Sacubitril/Valsartan,S/V)对维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)合并不同类型左心室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)心力衰竭患者治疗效果。
      方法  选取2022年6月1日至2023年5月31日湖北医药学院附属襄阳市第一人民医院MHD合并心力衰竭且连续服用S/V 3个月以上的患者,根据患者LVEF分为射血分数降低性心力衰竭(heart failure with reduced ejection fraction,HFrEF)组、射血分数中间值心力衰竭(heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction,HFmrEF)组及射血分数保留性心力衰竭(heart failure with preserved ejection fraction,HFpEF)组。回顾性分析用药前后心率、血压、血红蛋白(hemoglobin,Hb)、钾离子(K+)、尿酸(uric acid,UA)、估算肾小球滤过率(estimated glomerular filtration rate,eGFR)、肌酐(creatinine,Cr)、脑钠肽(brain natriuretic peptide,BNP)及超声心动图检查结果。
      结果  共155例患者纳入研究,其中HFrEF组、HFmrEF组和HFpEF组患者分别有41例、42例及72例。用药后,总体人群心率78.0(71.0,89.0)次/min比82.0(73.0,95.0)次/min、收缩压138.0(123.0,158.0)mmHg比155.0(139.0,173.0)mmHg(1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)、舒张压78.0(68.0,90.0)mmHg比90.0(76.0,100.0)mmHg、BNP水平729.6(234.9,1942.2)pg/ml比2562.7(928.9,4957.1)pg/ml及室间隔厚度12.0(11.0,13.0)mm比13.0(12.0,14.0)mm低于治疗前(均P<0.05);LVEF58.0(51.0,61.0)%比49.0(40.0,56.0)%水平较用药前升高(P<0.05)。患者用药前后纽约心脏协会(New York Heart Association,NYHA)心功能分级比例分布差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。HFrEF组患者用药后心率81.0(70.0,100.0)次/min比94.0(75.5,110.0)次/min、收缩压130.0(118.0,152.0)mmHg比146.0(128.0,166.0)mmHg、舒张压80.0(63.5,89.0)mmHg比79.0(72.0,96.0)mmHg、BNP1366.9(612.0,2991.4)pg/ml比4294.9(2562.3,5000.0)pg/ml及室间隔厚度12.0(11.0,13.0)mm比13.0(11.0,14.0)mm低于治疗前水平(均P<0.05);LVEF48.0(42.5,55.0)%比36.0(32.0,39.0)%水平用药后较前升高(P<0.05)。HFmrEF组患者用药后心率75.0(68.8,80.3)次/min比80.5(75.0,95.0)次/min、收缩压138.0(121.8,159.0)mmHg比158.0(139.0,181.3)mmHg、舒张压78.0(67.0,91.3)mmHg比92.0(79.8,104.8)mmHg、BNP765.5(245.1,2323.2)pg/ml比3179.7(1325.2,4967.8)pg/ml和室间隔厚度12.0(11.0,13.0)mm比13.0(12.0,14.0)mm较用药前降低(均P<0.05);LVEF54.5(50.8,60.0)%比47.0(44.0,48.0)%水平用药后明显升高(P<0.05)。HFpEF组患者用药后收缩压139.0(129.3,161.0)mmHg比161.5(146.3,173.8)mmHg、舒张压77.0(70.0,91.0)mmHg比90.5(78.0,99.8)mmHg、BNP433.5(171.4,1237.8)pg/ml比1109.0(651.9,2772.5)pg/ml及室间隔厚度12.0(11.0,12.0)mm比13.0(12.0,14.0)mm较用药前降低(均P<0.05);LVEF60.0(59.0,65.0)%比56.0(54.0,60.0)%水平用药后较前明显提升(P<0.05)。HFrEF组、HFmrEF组和HFpEF组患者K+、eGFR、UA水平用药前后差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
      结论  S/V对不同类型LVEF心力衰竭MHD患者具有降心率、降血压、改善心衰、减轻室间隔肥厚、提升心肌收缩力的作用。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the therapeutic efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V), a representative drug of angiotensin receptor enkephalinase inhibitors (ARNI), in patients with different types of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) heart failure (HF) on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).
      Methods  From June 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023, 155 MHD patients with concurrent HF continuously taking S/V for more than 3 months were selected. According to the level of LVEF, they were assigned into three groups of HF with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF, n=41), HF with mid-range ejection fraction(HFmrEF, n=42) and HF with preserved ejection fraction(HFmrEF, n=2). Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin (Hb), Potassium (K+), uric acid (UA), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine (Cr), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and echocardiographic findings before and after dosing were retrospectively reviewed.
      Results  After drug dosing, overall population HR 78.0(71.0, 89.0) beats/min vs 82.0(73.0, 95.0) beats/min, systolic blood pressure138.0(123.0, 158.0) mmHg vs 155.0(139.0, 173.0) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), diastolic blood pressure78.0(68.0, 90.0) mmHg vs 90.0(76.0, 100.0) mmHg, BNP level729.6(234.9, 1942.2) pg/ml vs 2562.7(928.9, 4957.1) pg/ml and interventricular septal thickness12.0(11.0, 13.0)mm vs 13.0(12.0, 14.0) mm were lower than those pre-treatment(all P<0.05); LVEF was higher than pre-dosing 58.0(51.0. 61.0)% vs 49.0(40.0, 56.0)%(P<0.05). The difference in proportional distribution of New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function class before and after drug administration was statistically significant(P<0.05). In HFrEF group, heart rate81.0(70.0, 100.0) beats/min vs 94.0(75.5, 110.0) beats/min, systolic blood pressure 130.0(118.0, 152.0)mmHg vs 146.0(128.0, 166.0) mmHg, diastolic blood pressure 80.0(63.5, 89.0)mmHg vs 79.0(72.0, 96.0)mmHg, BNP1366.9(612.0, 2991.4) pg/ml vs 4294.9(2562.3, 5000.0) pg/ml and ventricular septal thickness12.0(11.0, 13.0)mm vs 13.0(11.0, 11.0, 14.0) mm lower than pre-dosing (all P<0.05); LVEF was higher post-dosing than pre-dosing48.0(42.5, 55.0)% vs 36.0(32.0, 39.0)%(P<0.05). HFmrEF group had a higher post-dosing HR75.0(68.8, 80.3)beats/min vs 80.5(75.0, 95.0)beats/min, systolic blood pressure138.0(121.8, 159.0)mmHg vs 158.0(139.0, 181.3)mmHg, diastolic blood pressure78.0(67.0, 91.3)mmHg vs 92.0(79.8, 104.8)mmHg, BNP765.5(245.1, 2323.2)pg/ml vs 3179.7(1325.2, 4967.8)pg/ml and interventricular septal thickness12.0(11.0, 13.0)mm vs 13.0(12.0, 14.0)mm declined as compared with pre-dosing (all P<0.05); LVEF was significantly higher after dosing54.5(50.8, 60.0)% vs 47.0(44.0, 48.0)%(P<0.05). In HFpEF group, systolic blood pressure139.0(129.3, 161.0)mmHg vs 161.5(146.3, 173.8)mmHg, diastolic blood pressure77.0(70.0, 91.0)mmHg vs 90.5(78.0, 99.8)mmHg, BNP433.5(171.4, 1237.8)pg/ml vs 1109.0(651.9, 2772.5)pg/ml and thickness of interventricular septum12.0(11.0, 12.0)mm vs 13.0(12.0, 14.0)mm were lower than pre-dosing (all P<0.05). LVEF rose obviously post-dosing 60.0(59.0, 65.0)% vs 56.0(54.0, 60.0)%(P<0.05). The differences in K+, eGFR and UA levels before and after dosing were not statistically significant among HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF groups (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  S/V has been shown to lower HR, lower BR, improve HF, lessen septal hypertrophy and enhance myocardial contractility in MHD patients with different types of LVEF HF.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回