FRAIL衰弱量表及衰弱指数与老年维持性血液透析患者不良结局的相关性

    Correlation of FRAIL scale and fragile index with adverse outcomes in elderly patients on maintenance hemodialysis

    • 摘要:
      目的  探讨FRAIL衰弱量表及衰弱指数(fragile index,FI)与老年维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者不良结局的相关性。
      方法  选取2020年6月至2022年12月在解放军第九六〇医院行MHD治疗的老年患者116例,并按终点事件将其分为存活组(n = 89)和死亡组(n = 27)。收集患者临床信息,并采用FRAIL衰弱量表和FI评估患者的衰弱状态,多因素Cox回归分析FRAIL衰弱量表和FI与不良结局的相关性,受试者工作特征(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线评价FRAIL衰弱量表和FI对不良结局的预测价值。
      结果  死亡组FRAIL衰弱量表和FI评估的衰弱比例均高于存活组(P = 0.001);多因素Cox回归分析显示,调整年龄、性别、体重指数、糖尿病、高血压、原发病、Charlson合并症指数、连续肾脏替代治疗及血管通路后,FRAIL衰弱量表和FI(衰弱)的HR值及95%CI分别为18.552(2.249~153.018)和7.367(1.864~29.115)。ROC曲线分析结果显示FRAIL衰弱量表和FI预测不良结局的曲线下面积分别为0.792和0.711,且FRAIL衰弱量表明显高于FI的(Z = 2.135,P = 0.033)。
      结论  FRAIL衰弱量表和FI均与老年MHD患者不良结局有较强的相关性,且均能很好的预测不良结局,其中FRAIL预测能力更优。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the FRAIL scale and fragile index (FI) and adverse outcomes of elderly maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.
      Methods  From June 2020 to December 2022, 116 elderly patients on MHD were selected and assigned into two groups of survival (n = 27) and mortality (n = 89) according to the endpoint events. Clinical profiles were recorded. FRAIL scale and FI were utilized for assessing the frailty status. The correlation between FRAIL scale and FI and adverse outcomes was examined by multivariate COX regression. The predictive value of FRAIL scale and FI for adverse outcomes was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
      Results  The proportion of frailty assessed by FRAIL scale and FI was higher in mortality group than that in survival group (P = 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that, after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, primary disease, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and vascular access, hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of FRAIL and FI were 18.552(2.249-153.018) and 7.367(1.864-29.115), respectively. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve of FRAIL scale and FI for predicting adverse outcomes was 0.792 and 0.711, respectively, and the area under the curve of FRAIL scale was significantly higher than that of FI (Z = 2.135, P = 0.033).
      Conclusion  With a strong correlation with adverse outcomes in elderly MHD patients, both FRAIL scale and FI may well predict adverse outcomes and FRAIL offers a better predictive capability.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回