超声引导下自体动静脉内瘘狭窄腔内治疗入路建立策略的初步研究

    Preliminary study of various approaches to endovascular intervention for ultrasound-guided arteriovenous fistula stenosis

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨超声引导下自体动静脉内瘘(arteriovenous fistula,AVF)腔内治疗入路选择与狭窄的特点之间的关系,以总结入路建立策略,辅助腔内治疗有效、快速、安全进行。方法 选择自2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日于北京市海淀医院因AVF狭窄而行超声引导腔内治疗患者,回顾性分析患者基本资料,内瘘狭窄的部位,入路建立部位、方向,入路相关并发症,腔内治疗手术情况,通过Spearman相关分析了解内瘘狭窄特点与入路建立的关系。结果 521例患者进行693例次球囊血管成形术治疗。在狭窄部位中以吻合口狭窄多见,约38.24%;其次流出静脉狭窄约占31.60%、流入动脉狭窄占23.38%(含足跟部位狭窄9.67%);2处及2处以上以上病变6.78%。累计建立入路768例次,以回流静脉入路最多见约88.31%,其次为肱动脉、回流静脉双入路7.50%,回流静脉双入路3.32%;肱动脉、桡动脉远端入路相对少见。行球囊血管成形术治疗技术成功率95.53%,临床成功率95.24%。入路相关并发症发生率为5.47%,以痉挛(3.52%)、血肿(1.82%)多见,其中回流静脉血肿及痉挛均见于在未穿刺区域建立入路者。当存在足跟部位狭窄选择肱动脉、回流静脉双入路时手术技术成功率为97.92%(47/48),入路相关并发症发生率2.08%(1/48)且肱动脉、回流静脉双入路建立与流入动脉足跟部位狭窄显著相关(相关系数0.606,P<0.001)。结论 回流静脉是超声引导AVF狭窄腔内治疗的首选入路,对于复杂病变尤其合并流入动脉足跟狭窄者可考虑肱动脉与回流静脉双入路。

       

      Abstract: Objective To observe the relationship between endovascular approach and arteriovenous fistula (AVF)stenosis,discuss the basic principles of approach to endovascular intervention under ultrasonic guidance and provide practical and sound strategies for AVF stenosis.Methods From January 1,2017 to December 31,2019,patients receiving endovascular intervention under ultrasonic guidance for autologous AVF stenosis at Municipal Haidian Hospital were selected.Basic patient data,such as site,direction,complications of approach and outcomes,were retrospectively collected.And the relationship between endovascular approach and AVF stenosis was analyzed by Spearman’s correlation.Results A total of 521 patients underwent 693 (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty)PTA sessions.Anastomotic region stenosis predominated (38.24%);outflow venous stenosis (31.60%),inflow arterial stenosis (23.37%,including heel stenosis 9.67%) and over two stenoses (6.78%).A total of 768 approaches were established,including outflow vein approach (88.31%),dual approach of brachial artery & outflow vein (7.50%) and dual approach of outflow vein (3.32%).And dual approach of brachial & distal radial artery was relatively rare.Technical success rate of PTA was 96.68% and clinical success rate 96.39%.The incidence of approach-related complications was 4.96%.Spasticity (3.43%) and hematoma (1.78%)predominated.Outflow venous hematomas and spasm occurred at areas without puncture history.The technical success rate of PTA for inflow artery heel stenosis was 97.92% and the incidence of approach-related complications 2.08%.The dual approach of brachial artery and outflow vein was significantly correlated with inflow artery heel stenosis (correlation coefficient 0.606,P<0.01).Conclusions Outflow vein is a first choice for ultrasound-guided endovascular intervention of AVF stenosis.For complicated lesions,especially those with inflow arterial heel stenosis,dual approach of brachial artery and outflow vein is considered.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回